
The 365 Days Project, Part 2 (2007) UbuWeb is pleased to be co-hosting and archiving the second installment of Otis Fodder’s magnificent 365 Days Project. The first project was completed in 2003 and can be accessed here as well. 365 days of cool and strange and often obscure audio selections. Some words to describe the material featured would be… Celebrity, Children, Demonstration, Indigenous, Industrial, Outsider, Song-Poem, Spoken, Ventriloquism, and on and on and on. The best thing to do is to simply listen. UbuWeb’s archive will be updated monthly. For day-to-day updates, be sure to visit UbuWeb’s partner WFMU’s Beware of the Blog.
This villain, who puts words together with no intention of stating, hoping, praying, or persuading … only imagining, only creating … is to many immoral, certainly frivolous, a trivial person in a time of trouble (and what time is not?), a parasite upon whatever scrofulous body the body politic possesses at that moment. And roses are intolerably frivolous too, and those who grow them, snowmen and those who raise them up, and drinking songs and drinking, and every activity performed for its own inherent worth.
That’s William Gass again. I have to go back to this essay (”Carrots, Noses, Snow, Rose, Roses”) once in a while to remind myself that the writing that really brings me to my knees almost never has to do with politics, “memory,” or any moral imperative. But I was surprised — not unpleasantly — to find a persuasive ethical account of “pure” poetry in W.H. Auden’s 1957 essay, “Music in Shakespeare.”
I am sitting in the living room of one Mr. Garland Thompson Jr., who at the moment s a very, very busy man. He is a one-man whirling dervish, a battery-operated bulldozer, a little-bleary eyed at the moment. He is pretty much single-handedly organizing the 10th anniversary version of the West Coast Poetry Slam Championships, and just watching him is making my head pound.
It’s a massive undertaking. Ten teams, a few errant slammers with unbridled egos, posters, ID badges, brochures, newspaper coverage, food vendors, a DJ, travel arrangements, finding campsites for the teams, staging, lanyards, competition rules. And as it gets closer to to the big day (today, in fact), Garland gets a little snippy. His eyes glaze over a little. OK, a lot.
I’m in awe. I’ve always enjoyed the fruits of the festival organizer’s labor. I get my all-access pass, nibble on cheese in the green room, get on the stage when someone says “Get on the stage.” So, staying with Garland for these couple of days, I”m learning a lot. He’s a madman. He has to be.
First, the details, just in case you’re in Cali and want to have a huge amount of fun: The show’s today and tomorrow from noon to 6 at the Henry Miller Library in Big Sur. Yes, that’s BIG SUR, the lush and luscious jewel of th California coastline. It’s such a cool event that it’s worth logging off right now, getting a last minute flight and winging your way there–here–just so you can hang out and party with the po’ people and say you did.
That’s it from the sun. Garland’s going on about badges right now. Should be a kickass show.
I know that many of us submit our work to contests. I know for a fact that at least two Harrieteers, Ange and myself, have sent manuscripts to the annual National Poetry Series competition, and were lucky enough to have books published as a result. (Harrieteers…I like that. It’s like Mouseketeers, but without the ears or simmering psychoses…)
Sending your poems off to be judged is a little like dressing your daughter up in her finest clothes, making sure her skin is sparkling and her hair is perfect, kissing her goodbye, and putting her on a first-class flight to a college that hasn’t even accepted her yet.
The key is to keep it all in perspective. I enter fewer and fewer competitions (just no time), and when I do it’s for the perverse thrill of having my passion, my lifeblood, fondled by an stranger (OK, maybe there’s a simmering psychosis after all, and maybe it’s not so simmering). For me, the contests are still fun. Most of them anyway.
We’ve got a couple of categories to deal with, of course. Some contests are looking for a damned good poem, and the author of that ditty gets cash money and publication in a mag or literary journal. Other contests, usually sponsored by publishers, ask for a completed manuscript. If yours is chosen as pick o’ the crop, the book gets published and maybe you get little spending money besides. Then there are the immensely popular are-you-worth-it contests–although I’m sure organizers are cringing at the word “contest”–sponsored by the NEA and various regional grant-giving entities. They have money and they want to give it to you–but only if you can prove to them that you’re a worthwhile investment.
Somewhere in his essays, William Gass says that in reply to the foolish question, ‘Who do you write for?’ he says ‘The ear.’
This recurred to mind this week while perusing American Religious Poems: An Anthology, which I had gotten for my mother-in-law and which now served as fresh reading material for me, away from my own books. What a satisfying reading experience it was, and how easily conflicts over different compositional methods — say, Gjertrud Schnackenburg vs. Michael Palmer — are subordinated to a similar goal: addressing the pure and perfect Ear.
Even in circles where religious sentiment is taken to be a kind of failure of imagination (”middlebrow”), it’s hard to escape the air of transcendence that hovers over literature. I mean, delete the references to God in Annie Dillard and you practically get W.G. Sebald. Yet their audiences probably don’t overlap that much.
Last night, Lindsey, the babysitter, drubbed me in Boggle. I think her score was more than triple mine. I’m not positive about this: I was having trouble keeping track of my running total. My brain is soft. Words elude me. In fact, the word “elude” eluded me for about a minute.
Brandon Stosuy sends along this quote from a new song by Okkervil River: “From a bridge on Washington Avenue, the year of 1972, broke my bones and skull and it was memorable.”
Q: Who is the speaker?
Sooner or later, “Cucurrucucu Paloma” finds its way to you, poets, and you swoon — because you are among the last, the very last swooners.
Looking around the web for information on the songwriter, I came upon a credit for one Tomas Mendez. Its first recording ever was by Harry Belafonte on July 20, 1956.
This is almost exactly a year after Wallace Stevens dies, on August 2, 1955. So how do I explain –
|
John Cage David Wondrich Georges Perec Cheryl Donegan Sri Ramakrishna James Joyce Abraham Lincoln Gillespie Marjorie Perloff Christian Bök David Antin Aram Saroyan Roland Barthes Diana Vreeland Andy Warhol Jan Holcomb Ken Freedman Sten Hanson Larry Miller Yoko Ono Kay Rosen Walter Benjamin Augusto De Campos Sergio Bessa Ara Shirinyan Geoffrey Young James Siena Jean Baudrillard Gertrude Stein Samuel Beckett Alan Ginsberg Abbie Hoffman Frank Zappa Charles Ives Jill Simensky Jerome Rothenberg Wayne Koestenbaum Verner Panton Wallace Berman Barbara Cole |
Charles Bernstein Johanna Drucker Darren Wershler-Henry Lori Emerson Simon Morris Craig Dworkin Brian Kim Stefans Michael Scharf Karin Bravin Swami Tagathananda Frank Kitchens Bobbie Oliver Suzanne Joelson Gary Stephan Henry Turmon Gary Landown Al Filreis Ron Silliman Judy Hicks Bruce Andrews Leevi Lehto Jesper Olsson Pejk Malinovski Bern Porter Sophie Tucker Beniamino Gigli Maria Callas Thelonious Monk Neil Young Marcus Boon Henry James John Giorno Bill Arning Raphael Rubinstein Kurt Weill Robert Ashley Ellen Abramowitz Alexander Gray Brian Wilson |
José Reyes Joe Gould Ezra Pound Philip Guston Merce Cunningham Marcel Duchamp Buckminster Fuller Dick Higgins Aleba Gartner Émile Zola Jackson Mac Low Ludwig Wittgenstein George Antheil Eirk Satie Rob Fitterman Mauricio Kagel Caroline Bergvall Walt Frazier Alan Licht David Grubbs Ruth & Marvin Sackner Coyle & Sharpe Brion Gysin Vito Acconci Samuel Johnson Richard Foreman E.E. Cummings Jelle Meander Nicolas Musin Ron Wakkary Joan La Barbara Klaus Kinski David Daniels Gregory Whitehead Vicki Bennett Charles Eames Paul Smith |

YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL (YAB) is my favorite public art collective based in Chicago.
Thom Donovan
Bhanu Kapil
Fred Moten
Craig Santos Perez
Sina Queyras
Sotère Torregian
Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share
Who or what is a poet critic and why is the... (27)
Graphic Poetry Spotlight: Jai Arun Ravine’s... (3)
To Sonnet, to Son-net, Tuscon Net (54)
Beyond Careerism? (Redistributing Poetic... (30)
Women’s History Month: A Salute (3)
Copyright © 2010 Poetry Foundation Contact: mail@poetryfoundation.org Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
Poetryfoundation.org article RSS.
Magazine RSS.
Blog RSS.
Poem of the Day RSS.
Glossary Term of the Day RSS.