<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Review 01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/quick-review-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/quick-review-01/</link>
	<description>A blog from the Poetry Foundation where contemporary poets debate classic and contemporary poetry from America and around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:27:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Narayanan</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/quick-review-01/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Narayanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=410#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>Christian--
I am similarly uncomfortable, but on the other hand, a question.  Here is Nietsche in 1892:
I have grown weary of the poets, the old and the new:
they all seem to me superficial and shallow seas.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;They have not thought deeply enough: therefore
their feeling – has not plumbed the depths.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;A little voluptuousness and a little tedium: that is
all their best ideas have ever amounted to.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;All their harp-jangling is to me so much
coughing and puffing of phantoms; what have they ever
known of the ardour of tones!
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;They are not clean enough for me, either: they all
disturb their waters so that they may seem deep!
Is this a similar complaint?  Is this merely a variant of the age old philosopher&#039;s complaint about poets?  Are we just looking at the old duel between poetry and philosophy?
Laura Riding.  Laura Riding, indeed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian&#8211;<br />
I am similarly uncomfortable, but on the other hand, a question.  Here is Nietsche in 1892:<br />
I have grown weary of the poets, the old and the new:<br />
they all seem to me superficial and shallow seas.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;They have not thought deeply enough: therefore<br />
their feeling – has not plumbed the depths.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A little voluptuousness and a little tedium: that is<br />
all their best ideas have ever amounted to.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;All their harp-jangling is to me so much<br />
coughing and puffing of phantoms; what have they ever<br />
known of the ardour of tones!<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;They are not clean enough for me, either: they all<br />
disturb their waters so that they may seem deep!<br />
Is this a similar complaint?  Is this merely a variant of the age old philosopher&#8217;s complaint about poets?  Are we just looking at the old duel between poetry and philosophy?<br />
Laura Riding.  Laura Riding, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/quick-review-01/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=410#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>I suggest a close comparison with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spdbooks.org/Details.asp?BookID=0972888020&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;work&lt;/a&gt; of Katie Degentesh...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest a close comparison with the <a href="http://www.spdbooks.org/Details.asp?BookID=0972888020" rel="nofollow">work</a> of Katie Degentesh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
