<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing and Failure (Part 6)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/writing-and-failure-part-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/writing-and-failure-part-6/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gushue</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/09/writing-and-failure-part-6/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gushue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=396#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this continuing interesting series of posts.
&quot;No other artform can in fact tolerate such an incorrible affirmation maladroitness among it practioners&quot; is a wonderful statement and might even be true.  Artists in other media have been accused of this (my kid could paint that. I could bang pots together and make that), but these arguments seem to have much less purchase.  I guess my question is why?
I&#039;m also a bit fuzzy on these terms: readers, critics, (also) audience, public.  Who are these exactly?
Muir says that poets no longer have an audience (thanks to industrialization, maybe capitalism). There&#039;s only the public, to whom you may or may not appeal as you choose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this continuing interesting series of posts.<br />
&#8220;No other artform can in fact tolerate such an incorrible affirmation maladroitness among it practioners&#8221; is a wonderful statement and might even be true.  Artists in other media have been accused of this (my kid could paint that. I could bang pots together and make that), but these arguments seem to have much less purchase.  I guess my question is why?<br />
I&#8217;m also a bit fuzzy on these terms: readers, critics, (also) audience, public.  Who are these exactly?<br />
Muir says that poets no longer have an audience (thanks to industrialization, maybe capitalism). There&#8217;s only the public, to whom you may or may not appeal as you choose.<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_999"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 999 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

