<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rainbow, rainbow, rainbow!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/</link>
	<description>A blog from the Poetry Foundation where contemporary poets debate classic and contemporary poetry from America and around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:27:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Share</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>I think Alicia&#039;s exactly right (and only wish Quinn&#039;s had been a proper critical edition, though you can see why nobody&#039;d think it &quot;marketable.&quot;)  It&#039;ll be extremely interesting to see how people respond to the forthcoming Library of America Bishop volume, which may well go a long way to restore some context for the unfinished work, letters, incidental pieces, and so on.  Even the wonderful collected poems we&#039;ve had all these years has the liability of omitting the prose pieces that were woven together in the inexplicably out-of-print &lt;i&gt;Questions of Travel&lt;/i&gt;.  For too long it has been almost impossible for the casual reader to discover what Bishop&#039;s own books were like!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Alicia&#8217;s exactly right (and only wish Quinn&#8217;s had been a proper critical edition, though you can see why nobody&#8217;d think it &#8220;marketable.&#8221;)  It&#8217;ll be extremely interesting to see how people respond to the forthcoming Library of America Bishop volume, which may well go a long way to restore some context for the unfinished work, letters, incidental pieces, and so on.  Even the wonderful collected poems we&#8217;ve had all these years has the liability of omitting the prose pieces that were woven together in the inexplicably out-of-print <i>Questions of Travel</i>.  For too long it has been almost impossible for the casual reader to discover what Bishop&#8217;s own books were like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia (AE)</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia (AE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>I suppose we DO have a Bishop in fragments!  I did buy the Quinn book, despite sharing some of Rigoberto&#039;s unease about it.  Actually, I felt more uneasy about the drafts that were published in The New Yorker &lt;i&gt;as if&lt;/i&gt; they were finished poems--that, I think, was misleading, and I cannot imagine Bishop being pleased about it.  But Edgar Allen Poe &amp; The Juke Box itself is a fascinating book and a must-have now for Bishop fans.  The context of the book (and occasional facsimiles of the notebook pages in it) makes their unfinished nature very clear--even if it is impossible to read a draft printed on a page the way you would read it scrawled in a notebook.  Well, I am grateful for the book and would recommend it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose we DO have a Bishop in fragments!  I did buy the Quinn book, despite sharing some of Rigoberto&#8217;s unease about it.  Actually, I felt more uneasy about the drafts that were published in The New Yorker <i>as if</i> they were finished poems&#8211;that, I think, was misleading, and I cannot imagine Bishop being pleased about it.  But Edgar Allen Poe &#038; The Juke Box itself is a fascinating book and a must-have now for Bishop fans.  The context of the book (and occasional facsimiles of the notebook pages in it) makes their unfinished nature very clear&#8211;even if it is impossible to read a draft printed on a page the way you would read it scrawled in a notebook.  Well, I am grateful for the book and would recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rigoberto</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rigoberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, that project of Ms. Quinn&#039;s...people (and critics) had mixed reactions to this &quot;recovery&quot; project. I myself have to admit I didn&#039;t buy it or read it because I&#039;ve been waiting for a convincing argument to delve into the unfinished writings of Elizabeth Bishop...perhaps as archival curiosity, maybe that&#039;s the best lens. I don&#039;t know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, that project of Ms. Quinn&#8217;s&#8230;people (and critics) had mixed reactions to this &#8220;recovery&#8221; project. I myself have to admit I didn&#8217;t buy it or read it because I&#8217;ve been waiting for a convincing argument to delve into the unfinished writings of Elizabeth Bishop&#8230;perhaps as archival curiosity, maybe that&#8217;s the best lens. I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Share</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Well, we do have a Bishop in fragments, thanks to Alice Quinn&#039;s collection of her unfinished and unpublished work!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we do have a Bishop in fragments, thanks to Alice Quinn&#8217;s collection of her unfinished and unpublished work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia (AE)</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia (AE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>What a great story!  I can&#039;t tell you how often I&#039;ve been reading a poem in a magazine, and thought, yes, that is a nice ending, only to turn the page!  Imagine if we only had Bishop in fragments, a la Sappho, we might think that &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; the end of the poem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great story!  I can&#8217;t tell you how often I&#8217;ve been reading a poem in a magazine, and thought, yes, that is a nice ending, only to turn the page!  Imagine if we only had Bishop in fragments, a la Sappho, we might think that <i>was</i> the end of the poem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Vasquez</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/10/rainbow-rainbow-rainbow/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Vasquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=465#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>Rigoberto,
Thank you for your insightful comments about one of my favorite poets.  Elizabeth Bishop&#039;s poetry resonates with such wonderful imagery and music, and &quot;The Fish&quot; is just one of many memorable works.  For someone who only published approximately a hundred poems in her lifetime, Bishop has had a tremendous, well-deserved impact on many poets, especially when one considers her contemporaries (Lowell, Schwartz, Berryman, Jarrell).
Other poems of hers that are equally exquisite include &quot;Filling Station,&quot; &quot;At the Fishhouses,&quot; &quot;First Death in Nova Scotia,&quot; &quot;The Riverman,&quot; &quot;Large Bad Picture,&quot; &quot;Insomnia,&quot; &quot;Robinson Crusoe in England,&quot; &quot;One Art,&quot; &quot;Sestina,&quot; &quot;The Moose,&quot; &quot;The Man-Moth&quot;--I&#039;m sure others could list more titles of their favorite Bishop poems.
All the best,
--Robert
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rigoberto,<br />
Thank you for your insightful comments about one of my favorite poets.  Elizabeth Bishop&#8217;s poetry resonates with such wonderful imagery and music, and &#8220;The Fish&#8221; is just one of many memorable works.  For someone who only published approximately a hundred poems in her lifetime, Bishop has had a tremendous, well-deserved impact on many poets, especially when one considers her contemporaries (Lowell, Schwartz, Berryman, Jarrell).<br />
Other poems of hers that are equally exquisite include &#8220;Filling Station,&#8221; &#8220;At the Fishhouses,&#8221; &#8220;First Death in Nova Scotia,&#8221; &#8220;The Riverman,&#8221; &#8220;Large Bad Picture,&#8221; &#8220;Insomnia,&#8221; &#8220;Robinson Crusoe in England,&#8221; &#8220;One Art,&#8221; &#8220;Sestina,&#8221; &#8220;The Moose,&#8221; &#8220;The Man-Moth&#8221;&#8211;I&#8217;m sure others could list more titles of their favorite Bishop poems.<br />
All the best,<br />
&#8211;Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
