<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Songsongsonglessness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/12/and-songsongsonglessness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/12/and-songsongsonglessness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARGARET TASSI PIETRZAK</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/12/and-songsongsonglessness/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>MARGARET TASSI PIETRZAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=581#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>JANE,
YOU DESERVE THE ACCOLADES AND MUCH MORE.  I THINK I NEED TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND I DO NOT MEAN 6TH GRADE ENGLISH AT COPE MIDDLE SCHOOL.  I CERTAINLY DID NOT CATCH ALL THE SUBTLETIES OF YOUR WORK THAT THE REVIEWER DID.  HENCE, FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY.
LOVE YOU, SIS,
MARGARET
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JANE,<br />
YOU DESERVE THE ACCOLADES AND MUCH MORE.  I THINK I NEED TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND I DO NOT MEAN 6TH GRADE ENGLISH AT COPE MIDDLE SCHOOL.  I CERTAINLY DID NOT CATCH ALL THE SUBTLETIES OF YOUR WORK THAT THE REVIEWER DID.  HENCE, FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY.<br />
LOVE YOU, SIS,<br />
MARGARET<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_2106"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 2106 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Flynn</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/12/and-songsongsonglessness/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=581#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>Gift him with Taxonomic Hierarchies
Interesting book Rigoberto and a very interesting issue of translation - the problem concerning poets writing outside of English and how that translation then becomes another poem remains constant. Even stating that this makes two poems isn&#039;t fair for poet or reader, I guess all the fans must simply take on the semantics with open arms if they are to accept such translations, after all most languages have different definitions of noun or at least different rules for usage.
The names for things!  This is always an interesting subject for the structuralists. What objects are ever defined in this world, in terms of their referent, sign, and signification? What are we writing about - things that change, happen, or are done - aren&#039;t these events and isn&#039;t that what a noun is meant to describe?
As for the answer to the noun working as a verb: verbal noun, in grammar?  But certainly anthimeria is the best I can suggest in rhetoric - the use of one as if it were a member of another part of speech, Greek origins and such. However, I think the problem isn&#039;t what we name this but rather what we, English language users, are willing to accept and appreciate.
Thanks for all your illumination Rigoberto! and Yeah M.F.A. @ R.U.N.!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gift him with Taxonomic Hierarchies<br />
Interesting book Rigoberto and a very interesting issue of translation &#8211; the problem concerning poets writing outside of English and how that translation then becomes another poem remains constant. Even stating that this makes two poems isn&#8217;t fair for poet or reader, I guess all the fans must simply take on the semantics with open arms if they are to accept such translations, after all most languages have different definitions of noun or at least different rules for usage.<br />
The names for things!  This is always an interesting subject for the structuralists. What objects are ever defined in this world, in terms of their referent, sign, and signification? What are we writing about &#8211; things that change, happen, or are done &#8211; aren&#8217;t these events and isn&#8217;t that what a noun is meant to describe?<br />
As for the answer to the noun working as a verb: verbal noun, in grammar?  But certainly anthimeria is the best I can suggest in rhetoric &#8211; the use of one as if it were a member of another part of speech, Greek origins and such. However, I think the problem isn&#8217;t what we name this but rather what we, English language users, are willing to accept and appreciate.<br />
Thanks for all your illumination Rigoberto! and Yeah M.F.A. @ R.U.N.!<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_2105"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 2105 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

