Comments on: American Classics

By: Linda Campbell Franklin

Linda Campbell Franklin — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:27:16 +0000

Hello Daisy, Today (august 28) I read your letter in the July 13 NYT Book Review, and searched for you on the web. I’ve never been moved to do so before, but your letter was so good — in part because of the “work as a whole is a great city” about O’Hara. I like putting small and large things together. I especially enjoyed this post with the conjoined Seuss & Ginsberg lines. Very effective. I’ve been experimenting on my gobbledeGoogle.blogspot blog with found lines. I’m not sure this is a very original thing, but it sure is fun. And it’s not without value as an exercise for writers.
Report this comment

By: Troy Camplin, Ph.D.

Troy Camplin, Ph.D. — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:29:55 +0000

I’ve been reading Dr. Seuss to my daughter since she turned 1 (she’s now almost 17 months old) and she loves it. SHe’ll sit and make me read a dozen books. Even though I have read “Marvin K. Mooney” every day for 3 months now, I’m still loving it. I suppose I do for a few reasons. 1) The rhythms pattern well onto the brain’s rhythms, which 2) Will make it easier for my daughter to learn to read. I also love that she loves it. Rhythmic poetry is a lovely thing — it’s also a redundancy, since there is no poetry without some sort of rhythm (otherwise it’s just prose — I’ve read prose with line breaks, which is still prose, no matter how you break it up). Monosyllables are fine — first words for the baby.
Report this comment

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:59:08 +0000

I’m not sure you’re being fair to Theodore Seuss Geisel here. Yes, One Fish Two Fish drove Jessie up a tree fast, and me up a tree rather slowly, before our little guy got tired of it, but Fox in Socks is (among other things) an exploration of the way that sound can dominate meaning, signifiers dominate signifieds, all the way down the chain of discourse… or, if you like, an inquiry into the origins of poetic language. I am not entirely kidding.
Report this comment

By: Angela G.

Angela G. — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:01:09 +0000

Never thought of mixing a little Seussian sutra with some Ginsbergian green eggs & ham, Daisy, but what a great juxtaposition!
“Would you like it in a box? Would you like it with a fox?”
“I walked on the banks of the tincan banana dock … to look at the sunset over the box house hills…”
“Not in a box. Not with a fox. Not in a house. Not with a mouse. ”
“You were never no locomotive, Sunflower, you were a sunflower! And you Locomotive, you are a locomotive, forget me not!”
Report this comment

By: John Blackard

John Blackard — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:59:17 +0000

Well then, Daisy, you will love any of Arnold Lobel’s Frog and Toad books read together with Philip Schultz’s new book, Failure.
The joie de vivre of Lobel mingling with the schadenfreunde of Schultz…
John Blackard
http://www.johnablackard.com
Report this comment

By: Sina Queyras

Sina Queyras — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:15:55 +0000

Hi Daisy,
You might want to investigate Dennis Lee. Alligator PIe is a must have for the under five set, but for we who love to be astonished his two latest, Un and Yes/No, investigate the very conflation you get at above. Here’s a sampling:
Lullabye wept as asia
buckled,
rockabye einstein and all.
One for indigenous,
two for goodbye,
adam and eve and dodo.
Fly away mecca,
fly away rome,
lullabye wept in the lonely.
Once the iguanodon,
once the U.N.,
hush little orbiting gone.
Report this comment