Comments on: Conceptual Poetry Conference: Audio and Video

By: Doodle

Doodle — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:34:16 +0000

Since the focus on technique and genre these talks demonsrate inexorably leads to the reverence for names, it’s obvious that what this all boils down to is: professional maneuvers of, by, and for the professional cognoscenti.
Report this comment

By: Vivek Narayanan

Vivek Narayanan — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:42:51 +0000

Ah great, thanks. As for “conceptual poetry”, it seems to me all poetry is and ought to be conceptual, but this is the thing I really love and appreciate about it– its willingness to give itself away on the internet, making it accessible to all across borders.
Report this comment

By: Brian Salchert

Brian Salchert — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:16:03 +0000

Was going to begin this in a wise-ass manner, but. . . .
-
Mr. Goldsmith,
Your appropriative, uncreative, et cetera approach requires
a level of patience and stamina and whetever else
I do not possess although there have been periods in my life
when I have managed myself and time in similar ways.
-
On appropriation: If you know–unless there really is
another Brian Salchert, would you be willing to send
me an email regarding who appropriated my name
in the comments beneath your 11-14-2007 Play List
in Paper Cuts? I don’t intend to do anything about
it, but I would like to know.
Thank you,
Brian A. J. Salchert
Report this comment