Harriet

Categories

Follow Harriet on Twitter

About Harriet

Blogroll

In Memoriam Alvin Feinman, 1929-2008

By Reginald Shepherd

I am still in the hospital, awaiting surgery on an abdominal fistula that refuses to heal on its own—quite the contrary—but it’s very important to me to have Robert post this piece.
1
The wonderful poet, teacher and friend Alvin Feinman died a few days ago after a long struggle with emphysema and Parkinson’s disease. Alvin was one of the most important people in my poetic life, and I would like to pay him some small homage here.
Alvin Feinman was born in 1929 and raised in New York City. Though he has been named by Harold Bloom as part of the essential canon of Western literature—Bloom has written that “The best of his poems stand with the most achieved work of his generation”—Feinman is not included in any of the standard anthologies of modern or modern American poetry, not even Cary Nelson’s recent Oxford Anthology of Modern American Poetry, which explicitly aims at recovering and rediscovering neglected writers. Nor is he listed in the purportedly comprehensive Contemporary Authors reference series.


Though always committed to poetry (including, in his words, “even doggerel narratives in early childhood”), he had originally decided on philosophy as a career, and did graduate work at Yale to that end, until he realized that the dominant analytical school excluded all the important philosophical questions. It was in poetry that those unanswerable questions, questions of knowledge, perception, and the relation between being and appearance, could properly be addressed. As Feinman somewhat jocularly told me, “I was, even philosophically, convinced that, as I liked to put it, if according to Aristotle, ‘Poetry is more philosophical than history,’ so is it more philosophical than philosophy. The work I’d have had to do in philosophy would be to lay out the grounds for privileging poetry—which indeed our era has been more or less doing—vide Heidegger, Rorty, Derrida, etc.”
Feinman’s first book, Preambles and Other Poems, was published by Oxford University Press in 1964 to praise from such figures as Allen Tate, Conrad Aiken, Geoffrey Hartman, and Bloom. (Bloom’s discussion of this volume in his book The Ringers in the Tower: Studies in Romantic Tradition is the only extended treatment of Feinman’s work of which I am aware.) Now out of print, it was reissued with a handful of additional poems by Princeton University Press as Poems in 1990; that volume is also out of print. Feinman’s lack of a wider reputation is partly due to the unabashed difficulty of his poems, though as Harold Bloom writes, “their difficulty is their necessity” (The Ringers in the Tower, 315). But, given the popularity of other “difficult” poets, his neglect is mostly due to his distaste for the rituals of literary self-promotion.
Alvin Feinman is a true visionary poet, heir to Stevens and Crane in the modern line and, further back, to Blake, Wordsworth, and Shelley, poets who invented human consciousness as a subject matter for poetry. In Harold Bloom’s description, “the central vision in [Preambles] is of the mind, ceaselessly an activity, engaged in the suffering process of working apart all things that are joined by it” (op. cit., 315). Bloom calls this “a tragedy of the mind, victim to its own intent, which is to make by separations” (op. cit., 316).
Feinman’s poems demand much of the reader (at times resisting the intelligence almost successfully, as Stevens said that the poem should), but they offer many rewards in return, including dazzling imagery (light and the work light does is omnipresent) and dense, rich verbal music. Eliot wrote that genuine poetry can communicate before it is understood, and Feinman’s poems do so amply.
John Hollander has written that Feinman’s poetry explores the indefinable boundary between the visual and the visionary. In one of the blurbs for Preambles, Conrad Aiken wrote that Feinman’s was “true metaphysical poetry.” His poems constitute an epistemological and phenomenological investigation of the world, a probing of the surfaces of things that moves from seeing to seeing-into to seeing-through to the other side of appearances, exposing the luminous interior of the material world. As Bloom has written, the “opposition between the imaginative self and reality seems as central to these poems as it was to Stevens’ and as grandly articulated.”
2
Alvin Feinman is also the only person in my writing life whom I could truly call a mentor. I have had professors from whom I’ve learned, who have taught me valuable things about my work (sometimes intentionally, sometimes inadvertently or even against their will). But few were truly formative, and fewer still were both consistent and constructive in their attention. For one thing, he was the first professor to understand what my poems were trying to do, even though they didn’t always succeed.
Alvin, with whom I did my undergraduate creative writing thesis at Bennington College, never did anything for me but help me write better poems. He never did anything to me but make me see that however pleased I was with something I’d written, it could always be better, had to be better if I were to call myself a poet. For Alvin, to be a poet was always an aspiration, not something that one could claim to be. I think if I’d have asked him he would have said, “I would like to be a poet.”
Alvin expected everything of poetry, his own and others’. As he once said to me, “Poetry is always close kin to the impossible, isn’t it?” There was no point in reading a poem unless it was great, and no point in writing a poem unless it (not you: it) aspired to greatness. He was especially alert to the occasions when a poem failed to live up to its own possibilities, when it fell away into the mundane from therevelations it proposed. Usually the poem failed by settling for the merely personal. For Alvin, one’s interest in oneself had no place in poetry, and in his poems one will find not face but mask. But it’s a mask more alive than the great mass of mere faces.
Alvin also helped me learn the difference between whether something was done well and whether it needed to be done at all. He warned against the dangers of what he called “fluency über alles,” of writing something because you can or because you want to. What you want has no place in poetry: only what the poem wants matters. He once said of a poem of mine that he saw little in it but my desire to write a poem, and he saw accurately. But Alvin also taught me to listen more carefully, to look more closely, to be more aware of the poem’s intentions. He was an exacting reader, and his is an example I am constantly trying to live up to.
3
I love all of Alvin’s poems, but this one in particular, the first poem of his I ever read, is one of my favorites.
November Sunday Morning
And the light, a wakened heyday of air
Tuned low and clear and wide,
A radiance now that would emblaze
And veil the most golden horn
Or any entering of a sudden clearing
To a standing, astonished, revealed…
That the actual streets I loitered in
Lay lit like fields, or narrow channels
About to open to a burning river;
All brick and window vivid and calm
As though composed in a rigid water
No random traffic would dispel…
As now through the park, and across
The chill nailed colors of the roofs,
And on near trees stripped bare,
Corrected in the scant remaining leaf
To their severe essential elegance,
Light is the all-exacting good,
That dry, forever virile stream
That wipes each thing to what it is,
The whole, collage and stone, cleansed
To its proper pastoral…
I sit
And smoke, and linger out desire.

Comments (11)

  • On July 15, 2008 at 2:33 pm Eric Mattingly wrote:

    Easily the most underappreciated poet of the century. My condolences to his friends and family. Perhaps now would be the time for somebody to reissue his book(s).
    Vale,
    eric

  • On July 16, 2008 at 9:39 pm raphael rubinstein wrote:

    I also remember Alvin Feinman as a fantastic teacher, whose style often seemed to consist of long silences during which he puffed on a cigarette as he pondered his students’ efforts. Somehow this conveyed more than words ever could, though I have never forgotten some of his comments. He once explained (circa 1976) the influence of John Ashbery with the pithy phrase “about is out.”

  • On July 16, 2008 at 11:25 pm Mary Meriam wrote:

    Raf? (or Rafe?) Is that you? I was the one singing (screeching) the Queen of the NIght’s song in her dorm room. You were the one who asked me to shut up. You were the one in the poetry workshop who asked Alvin, after I commented on a poem, “Nihilistic?” Alvin was the one striding across the field, deep in conversation with Harold Bloom. I was there 75-78. I think you were there, too. You were the tall, dark, handsome, brilliant one with the gorgeous girlfriend.

  • On July 25, 2008 at 11:07 am Rebecca Wolff wrote:

    I studied with Alvin when I was 17, a freshman at Bennington. He must have been so troubled by me, as I would simply weep at his critiques of my poems. Any critique at all, I would just weep. Strange to realize how young he was then; to me he looked like a creature of antiquity.

  • On July 25, 2008 at 3:21 pm Mary Meriam wrote:

    Rebecca Wolff! How really nice to see you here. I’ve been reading the latest FENCE – the Rosenthal essay is great. Everyone at Harriet should read that essay.
    The first time I saw Alvin – from a distance – even from a distance, he seemed monumental – I knew he was the reason I was at Bennington. I studied with him the whole time, though I never cried, except over my typewriter.

  • On July 26, 2008 at 9:09 pm Raphael rubinstein wrote:

    Hi Mary,
    I remember you and your poems. (let’s find each other outside this blog…)I guess we are some of many writers inspired by AF’s teaching. For anyone interested in another ex-Feinman student, check out marcpenka.com. Marc was a brilliant poet and literary scholar who died far too young. In one of Feinman’s classes he asked us each to bring in our favorite poem: Marc brought in Ashbery’s “Farm Implements and Rutabagas in a Landscape” and I one of Berryman’s last poems. Somewhere I read a piece by Susan Wheelr about her experience of this class. I think we were all puzzled amd intrigued by AF’s long silence, after such an auspicious beginning. Was he the poetic equivalent of a one-hit wonder?

  • On July 29, 2008 at 2:36 pm Terry Berne wrote:

    Marc Penka wrote his creative thesis at Bennington under Alvin’s auspices. Several of those poems can be read at the marcpenka.com website. Marc’s relationship with Alvin was characterized by mutual respect and friendly conflict. Marc argued that poetry was both revolutionary and apocalyptic, both notions that Alvin was little disposed to accept. I followed the drama through weekly reports from Marc. Alvin really forced Marc to justify every word of every poem he wrote, and the results show, as Marc’s poetry is both radical and elegant, not an easy combination to pull off. When after two years Marc finally fished the final draft of poems making up his thesis, Alvin, who had argued bitterly with him over Marc’s syntactic innovations, finally and humbly offered Marc his highest esteem. With the distance of years, it’s now easy to see how close they really were in poetic temprament and even aims. Marc owed a lot to Alvin, and I think Alvin owed something to his dialogue with his more radical student. The poets they admired most formed the same visionary lineage. Alvin is underknown, and now the same is happening to his brilliant, charasmatic student. Poetry recently turned down his work. But many will remember his wonderful, rollicking readings at Bennington and at St. Marks.

  • On July 29, 2008 at 5:18 pm Mary Meriam wrote:

    In 1978, Marc Penka preceded me at our poetry thesis reading. I didn’t much care for the way he violently and deliberately knocked over the podium – or whatever it was that was passing for a podium. That kind of “radicalism” is not really radical, because there’s nothing original about it. Now I just looked at the poetry on his website, and the first poem is “Damn the Iambic.” Well, that’s enough of a statement to completely offend me – I’m devoted to the iambic. Raf, I just read your memorial on his site. I was rather alarmed by the format of that issue of Silo. Was I a co-editor, too? I think so. Anyhow, I’m sorry Marc died.

  • On July 30, 2008 at 8:44 pm raphael rubinstein wrote:

    Mary, if you can get beyond the offensive title, you will see that the poem in question is written in–yes–iambic pentameter. It is also, as you will see, a sonnet that, by its own admission, stops one line short. Marc knew what he was doing, maybe even when he knocked over that podium. But isn’t it the poems, not the anecdotes, that finally count?
    Marc and I designed that issue of Silo with the intention of trashing all the decorum of previous issues. It was 10 years after 1968, and we wanted to mark that moment, as well as include as much good writing as possible. There are several of your poems in that issue, chosen, as I recall, my me and Marc.
    It’s good to hear this account of AF’s teaching from Terry Berne, now of Madrid, himself another ex-Feinman student, who created the web site devioted to Marc’s life and work.

  • On March 26, 2009 at 5:41 pm Robin Leder wrote:

    TERRY, WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MADRID???????
    LOVE, ROBIN LEDER
    I’M ON PROBATION IN PENNSYLVANIA. YUK

  • On July 27, 2009 at 12:20 pm Robin Leder wrote:

    Dear Terry, Will you please send me an E-mail with your
    address. I saved Marc and am so sorry that he died.

    Love, Robin

    I have to go put away 4 loads of laundry so I can’t think of anything else to say…………………………


Posted in Uncategorized on Monday, July 14th, 2008 by Reginald Shepherd.