<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kneejerk poetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/</link>
	<description>A blog from the Poetry Foundation where contemporary poets debate classic and contemporary poetry from America and around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:29:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Galee</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Galee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>Poetry is a lover&#039;s whine
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poetry is a lover&#8217;s whine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodle</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5058</guid>
		<description>Poetry is madness without the madman.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poetry is madness without the madman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Share</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5057</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5057</guid>
		<description>I digress from the original ironizing intent of this thread, lost weeks ago, anyhow, to address the quotation above from O.W., which happens to be one of my pettest peeves!
The following is from Mark Scroggins&#039; blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://kulturindustrie.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Culture Industry&lt;/a&gt;:
-
... I quoted Oscar Wilde &quot;All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling&quot; – which prompted a useful comment from Don Share: &quot;I&#039;m not sure if genuine feeling is the same as sentimentality, but of the latter, Richard Hugo said: &#039;Our reaction against the sentimentality embodied in Victorian and post-Victorian writing was so resolute writers came to believe that the further from sentimentality we got, the truer the art. That was a mistake.&#039;&quot; That&#039;s a good observation, &amp; deserves as follow-up a bit more of the context of Wilde&#039;s remark (which gets quoted as if it were a free-standing aphorism, rather than a line from Gilbert in &quot;The Critic as Artist&quot;):
the real artist is he who proceeds, not from feeling to form, but from form to thought and passion. He does not first conceive an idea, and then say to himself, &#039;I will put my idea into a complex metre of fourteen lines,&#039; but, realising the beauty of the sonnet-scheme, he conceives certain modes of music and methods of rhyme, and the mere form suggests what is to fill it and make it intellectually and emotionally complete. From time to time the world cries out against some charming artistic poet, because, to use its hackneyed and silly phrase, he has &#039;nothing to say.&#039; But if he had something to say, he would probably say it, and the result would be tedious. It is just because he has no new message, that he can do beautiful work. He gains his inspiration from form, and from form purely, as an artist should. A real passion would ruin him. Whatever actually occurs is spoiled for art. All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling. To be natural is to be obvious, and to be obvious is to be inartistic.
To which Ernest replies: &quot;I wonder do you really believe what you say?&quot; A good question – one might argue, I suppose, that by this point in the dialogue Gilbert has become rather shall we say &quot;carried away&quot; by his own rhetoric on behalf of a formalist insincerity, a method for the artist to &quot;multiply his personalities.&quot;
The simplest thing to say is that &quot;genuine feeling&quot; – &quot;sincerity&quot; – is not enough to make good poetry (tho it&#039;s great for voyeuristically interesting blogs), but that poetry can be a way of embodying such genuine feeling in form – a sincere regard for which (&amp; here I follow Zukofsky, &amp; suspect the Divine Oscar would agree) is a necessity for successful verse.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I digress from the original ironizing intent of this thread, lost weeks ago, anyhow, to address the quotation above from O.W., which happens to be one of my pettest peeves!<br />
The following is from Mark Scroggins&#8217; blog, <a href="http://kulturindustrie.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Culture Industry</a>:<br />
-<br />
&#8230; I quoted Oscar Wilde &#8220;All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling&#8221; – which prompted a useful comment from Don Share: &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure if genuine feeling is the same as sentimentality, but of the latter, Richard Hugo said: &#8216;Our reaction against the sentimentality embodied in Victorian and post-Victorian writing was so resolute writers came to believe that the further from sentimentality we got, the truer the art. That was a mistake.&#8217;&#8221; That&#8217;s a good observation, &#038; deserves as follow-up a bit more of the context of Wilde&#8217;s remark (which gets quoted as if it were a free-standing aphorism, rather than a line from Gilbert in &#8220;The Critic as Artist&#8221;):<br />
the real artist is he who proceeds, not from feeling to form, but from form to thought and passion. He does not first conceive an idea, and then say to himself, &#8216;I will put my idea into a complex metre of fourteen lines,&#8217; but, realising the beauty of the sonnet-scheme, he conceives certain modes of music and methods of rhyme, and the mere form suggests what is to fill it and make it intellectually and emotionally complete. From time to time the world cries out against some charming artistic poet, because, to use its hackneyed and silly phrase, he has &#8216;nothing to say.&#8217; But if he had something to say, he would probably say it, and the result would be tedious. It is just because he has no new message, that he can do beautiful work. He gains his inspiration from form, and from form purely, as an artist should. A real passion would ruin him. Whatever actually occurs is spoiled for art. All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling. To be natural is to be obvious, and to be obvious is to be inartistic.<br />
To which Ernest replies: &#8220;I wonder do you really believe what you say?&#8221; A good question – one might argue, I suppose, that by this point in the dialogue Gilbert has become rather shall we say &#8220;carried away&#8221; by his own rhetoric on behalf of a formalist insincerity, a method for the artist to &#8220;multiply his personalities.&#8221;<br />
The simplest thing to say is that &#8220;genuine feeling&#8221; – &#8220;sincerity&#8221; – is not enough to make good poetry (tho it&#8217;s great for voyeuristically interesting blogs), but that poetry can be a way of embodying such genuine feeling in form – a sincere regard for which (&#038; here I follow Zukofsky, &#038; suspect the Divine Oscar would agree) is a necessity for successful verse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bock</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5056</guid>
		<description>&quot;All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling...&quot;
-O.W.
&quot;There is poetry when we realize we possess nothing&quot;
-Cocteau
&quot;it matters that great poems get written; it doesn’t matter a damn who writes them.&quot;
--E.P.
&quot;All our ingenuity is lavished on getting into danger legitimately so that we may be genuinely rescued.&quot;
--R.F.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling&#8230;&#8221;<br />
-O.W.<br />
&#8220;There is poetry when we realize we possess nothing&#8221;<br />
-Cocteau<br />
&#8220;it matters that great poems get written; it doesn’t matter a damn who writes them.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;E.P.<br />
&#8220;All our ingenuity is lavished on getting into danger legitimately so that we may be genuinely rescued.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;R.F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5055</guid>
		<description>&gt; Funny that modernism
It&#039;s only funny until someone loses an I.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Funny that modernism<br />
It&#8217;s only funny until someone loses an I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5054</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5054</guid>
		<description>Pound&#039;s old saw that an epic is “a poem including history.”
Funny that modernism is full of old saws.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pound&#8217;s old saw that an epic is “a poem including history.”<br />
Funny that modernism is full of old saws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Homer</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5053</guid>
		<description>&quot;A poet must have a dry soul.&quot; Howard Nemerov
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A poet must have a dry soul.&#8221; Howard Nemerov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodle</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5052</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5052</guid>
		<description>&quot;the politics in a poem has to do with how it / enters the world&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the politics in a poem has to do with how it / enters the world&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Robbins</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5051</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5051</guid>
		<description>(Oh, I see, you mean what was Morrison&#039;s source for the story. Sorry. I just woke up.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Oh, I see, you mean what was Morrison&#8217;s source for the story. Sorry. I just woke up.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Robbins</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/08/kneejerk-poetics/#comment-5050</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1022#comment-5050</guid>
		<description>John, the quotation tells you who Morrison is quoting. It&#039;s the emperor Tching Tang, &quot;the founder of the Shang dynasty.&quot; He inscribed it on his bath tub (supposedly). But I think the veil of Maya might be onto something.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, the quotation tells you who Morrison is quoting. It&#8217;s the emperor Tching Tang, &#8220;the founder of the Shang dynasty.&#8221; He inscribed it on his bath tub (supposedly). But I think the veil of Maya might be onto something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
