<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A broader question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/</link>
	<description>A blog from the Poetry Foundation where contemporary poets debate classic and contemporary poetry from America and around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:27:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lavinia Greenlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>Lavinia Greenlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1207#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>Thank you both for your excellent questions/observations.
Both the initial question and the one Kent proposes could be applied to why people write poems as well as how.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for your excellent questions/observations.<br />
Both the initial question and the one Kent proposes could be applied to why people write poems as well as how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1207#comment-6583</guid>
		<description>Lydia Olidea said above, synchronous with my own comment:
&gt;Re the initial question: the exchange rate is nature, now.
And one might add: Marxist theory in English/Poetics programs is no less part of the governing Exchange Rate.
Sociology precedes poetry,
Kent
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lydia Olidea said above, synchronous with my own comment:<br />
>Re the initial question: the exchange rate is nature, now.<br />
And one might add: Marxist theory in English/Poetics programs is no less part of the governing Exchange Rate.<br />
Sociology precedes poetry,<br />
Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia Olidea</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/#comment-6582</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia Olidea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1207#comment-6582</guid>
		<description>Re the initial question: the exchange rate &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; nature, now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the initial question: the exchange rate <i>is</i> nature, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2008/12/a-broader-question/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1207#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>A serious question:
In our poetry today, how do we separate out Nature from the Exchange Rate?
Happy New Year to the Harriet community.
Kent
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A serious question:<br />
In our poetry today, how do we separate out Nature from the Exchange Rate?<br />
Happy New Year to the Harriet community.<br />
Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
