<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA hiatus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/01/la-hiatus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/01/la-hiatus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/01/la-hiatus/#comment-6593</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1212#comment-6593</guid>
		<description>Cathy Park Hong is right: The Museum of Jurassic Technology is a poet&#039;s museum...
However, it does appear to be the rule today that poets, mainstream and avant alike, must ever exhibit themselves as if they were in the Smithsonian, under glass, accompanied by authenticating brass plaque...
Perhaps the better, largely untried task for poets is not to write odes &quot;to&quot; or &quot;about&quot; the MJT, but to write *inside* that project&#039;s spirit, prepositionally emulating its strange interferences of origin and authenticity? [note: our so-called &quot;Conceptual poetry,&quot; certified by those brass plaques it so eagerly attaches to its products, is the exact opposite of this spirit.]
For those not familiar, the best introduction to David Wilson&#039;s masterpiece-in-process is Lawrence Weschler&#039;s Mr. Wilson&#039;s Cabinet of Wonder (1995).
Kent
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy Park Hong is right: The Museum of Jurassic Technology is a poet&#8217;s museum&#8230;<br />
However, it does appear to be the rule today that poets, mainstream and avant alike, must ever exhibit themselves as if they were in the Smithsonian, under glass, accompanied by authenticating brass plaque&#8230;<br />
Perhaps the better, largely untried task for poets is not to write odes &#8220;to&#8221; or &#8220;about&#8221; the MJT, but to write *inside* that project&#8217;s spirit, prepositionally emulating its strange interferences of origin and authenticity? [note: our so-called "Conceptual poetry," certified by those brass plaques it so eagerly attaches to its products, is the exact opposite of this spirit.]<br />
For those not familiar, the best introduction to David Wilson&#8217;s masterpiece-in-process is Lawrence Weschler&#8217;s Mr. Wilson&#8217;s Cabinet of Wonder (1995).<br />
Kent<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_6593"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 6593 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wg</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/01/la-hiatus/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>wg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pf/harriet/?p=1212#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried writing about the MJT. It&#039;s very very hard.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried writing about the MJT. It&#8217;s very very hard.<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_6592"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 6592 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

