<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is that a poem in your pocket?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/04/is-that-a-poem-in-your-pocket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/04/is-that-a-poem-in-your-pocket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/04/is-that-a-poem-in-your-pocket/#comment-9572</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/?p=2151#comment-9572</guid>
		<description>I can dig it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can dig it.<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_9572"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 9572 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G the Art Spy</title>
		<link>http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2009/04/is-that-a-poem-in-your-pocket/#comment-9335</link>
		<dc:creator>G the Art Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/?p=2151#comment-9335</guid>
		<description>I like the neon, art-history pastiche first one--with its lightness and its Andy Warhol screenprinting glam--but really, did you fall &quot;head over heels&quot; for this.  

This stuff is really intentionally crude--as if children&#039;s drawings were art--(that has been done, badly, already).  I just think that so-called &quot;modern&quot; people, while appreciating the intentionally crude-reveal themselves as far stupider than the ancients.  So many fallacies, so little time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the neon, art-history pastiche first one&#8211;with its lightness and its Andy Warhol screenprinting glam&#8211;but really, did you fall &#8220;head over heels&#8221; for this.  </p>
<p>This stuff is really intentionally crude&#8211;as if children&#8217;s drawings were art&#8211;(that has been done, badly, already).  I just think that so-called &#8220;modern&#8221; people, while appreciating the intentionally crude-reveal themselves as far stupider than the ancients.  So many fallacies, so little time.<br /><span id="reportcomment_results_div_9335"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 9335 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

