The Flarf and Conceptual Writing portfolio was not meant as a survey of the whole field of digital poetry. Rather, it focused on two specific groups who ask what it means to be a poet in the Internet age. Certainly many others are asking the same question and hopefully coming up with equally provocative and challenging responses.
In regard to Mary Anne Sullivan’s accusation that these “fads” are “tired and old,” we say: if it all sounds familiar, it is. Conceptual Writing and Flarf obstinately make no claims on originality. On the contrary, we employ intentionally self- and ego-effacing tactics using uncreativity, unoriginality, illegibility, appropriation, plagiarism, fraud, theft, and falsification as our precepts; information management, word processing, databasing, and extreme process as our methodologies; and boredom, valuelessness, and nutritionlessness as our ethos. If we appear to you as fads, then we feel we’ve succeeded beyond our wildest expectations: we’ll be yesterday’s news by the time you read this.
Poetry Magazine
Kenneth Goldsmith Responds
Poetry is looking for thought-provoking responses to work published in the magazine, as well as letters that raise new questions about the state of contemporary poetry. To send us your letter, please fill out all the fields below.
If we choose to use your letter, we will notify you by phone. If you have not heard from us within two weeks of sending your letter, you may assume we will not be using it. All letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may appear online, in print, or both.
Please do NOT send poetry submissions to this account. See Submission Guidelines for further information and policies regarding poetry submissions.



Avant-Garde All the Time: Continental Drift
Kenneth Goldsmith Responds