Letter from Poetry Magazine

Letter to the Editor

by Andrew David King

Dear Editor,

In his commentary on “public poetry” in April’s issue, David Orr raises some astute points but does not fully confront notions about whether poetry is beholden to the poet, to an audience, both, or neither.

While critiquing Thomas Sayers Ellis’s use of rejection letters and place-specific references as “unambitious,” Orr leaves unexplained the implications of discussing these elements as poetic blind spots rather than demarcations of the poet’s perspective. His complaints about a hermetic “audience composed almost entirely of poets” are beneficial—to an extent. Is Ellis then obligated to address the experiences he deems significant only in terms that, ostensibly, some hypothetical public will relate to?
Orr’s discussion of Wilner’s book is also problematic for this reason. Predicated on the idea that “violent tendencies” like war can be understood, Orr finds fault with Wilner’s self-proclaimed failure to do so. And yet no support is offered for the myth, whether put forth by poets or historians, of an end-all framework for our species’ violence. I am unsure if I agree with the extension of this logic: that poetry need aspire to certainty or at least theoretical claims in the same way that, say, political theory does. If this is the case, where instead can we perform the work of unraveling our knotted thoughts?
Certainly poetry should not (and cannot, no matter how much it feigns) divorce itself from the politics of a very real world; Ellis and Wilner both speak to social ills. But perhaps not all poems can satiate the needs of the self and Orr’s idealized public at once. We ask that poets speak honestly of their innermost selves—and that they speak to us, for us, about things relevant to our lives. Which one is it?

berkeley, california

Originally Published: June 1, 2011

Poetry is looking for thought-provoking responses to work published in the magazine, as well as letters that raise new questions about the state of contemporary poetry. To send us your letter, please fill out all the fields below.

If we choose to use your letter, we will notify you by phone. If you have not heard from us within two weeks of sending your letter, you may assume we will not be using it. All letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may appear online, in print, or both.

Please do NOT send poetry submissions to this account. See Submission Guidelines for further information and policies regarding poetry submissions.


* All fields are required


This prose originally appeared in the June 2011 issue of Poetry magazine

June 2011

Originally appeared in Poetry magazine.

This poem has learning resources.

This poem is good for children.

This poem has related video.

This poem has related audio.