Harriet

Categories

Follow Harriet on Twitter

About Harriet

Blogroll

Poetry News

Daniel Halpern Answers ‘Why Poetry?’

By Harriet Staff

12312916275_46874b24f7_b

For NYT’s Book Review section, Daniel Halpern brings together an esteemed collective with a variety of answers to questions about poetry’s impact financially, emotionally, and otherwise. Halpern writes: “Why Poetry? Well, yes. Most books of poetry sell a couple of thousand copies, at best. So in a quantitative sense, what’s the point of supporting it? With dollars or sense? Would we make the same argument for investing in an endangered species?” After reading his thorough analysis, informed by luminaries like Wallace Stevens, Robert Hass, and
Louise Glück you’ll agree that poetry has lasting significance. More:

The issue is larger than the number of collections of poetry sold each year. It’s about the language — our language. Is it, too, endangered? If the depleted language of emails and texts and Twitter is any indication, then there’s a case to be made that it might be.

Still, a question I often ask myself is why so many people (and we’re now talking about millions of people) turn to poetry for all important rites of passage — weddings, funerals, toasts, tragedies, eulogies, birthdays. . . . Why? Because the language of poetry avoids the quotidian — but the best poetry simultaneously celebrates the quotidian. Language that’s focused in such a way that true meaning and emotion is redolent in the air. The poet W.S. Merwin once said: “Poetry addresses individuals in their most intimate, private, frightened and elated moments . . . because it comes closer than any other art form to addressing what cannot be said. In expressing the inexpressible, poetry remains close to the origins of language.”

Why poetry? I sent out a few emails to see what various people had to say. The poet Louise Glück, on the subject of book sales, wrote back, “The books may not sell, but neither are they given away or thrown away. They tend, more than other books, to fall apart in their owners’ hands. Not I suppose good news in a culture and economy built on obsolescence. But for a book to be loved this way and turned to this way for consolation and intense renewable excitement seems to me a marvel.”

Continue at NYT.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Poetry News on Tuesday, January 3rd, 2017 by Harriet Staff.