Harriet

Jeffrey McDaniel

contests. contested. the pros and cons of testing.

It’s interesting to read the recent posts by Kwame and Kenny talking about first books and prizes (or the lack thereof). It makes me wonder what percentage of first books published each year are attached to contests. I’m glad that Kenny pointed out that a number of first books do get published each year outside the mainstream. (Is “mainpuddle” more appropriate?)


It’s undeniable that there has been a proliferation of first book contests over the past twenty years; in the late 80’s there were a handful and now there are dozens. The rash of contests is problematic for reasons beyond why an entity like Foetry was able to gain traction: (waiter, there’s a con in my test). It’s unhealthy when many poetry publishers won’t even read manuscripts without an entry fee. I can kind of understand the publishers’ defense: they’re understaffed, doing the best they can, first books are hard to sell, and the contest entry fees are a quick, reliable source of capital. But you hear stories, like Joshua Beckman entering fifty-two contests before Gerald Stern picked his manuscript, and it all starts to seem a little absurd.
Just for the record, I met my publisher at the National Poetry Slam in San Francisco in 1993. It was the second day of the event. I read a poem, Following Her To Sleep, that had been published in Ploughshares (and would later appear in Best American Poetry). (Strangely my poems that tended to do the best in slams were often also my poems that did the best on the page.) (By “did the best”, I mean getting published and anthologized.) Anyway, the publisher’s husband came up to me in an alleyway behind the venue where I was sharing a bottle of whisky with a poet from the other “team” (Asheville), a guy named Pat Storm—may he rest in peace—and the publisher’s husband casually mentioned that his wife (Jennifer Joseph at Manic D) would be interested in publishing my book.
At first, I declined. I wanted to win a contest, the Yale specifically. I wanted to be like James Tate. Luckily I moved away from that position and went with Manic D. Who knows how many contests I would have had to enter, (all those checks and clerical work), before something finally clicked. In hindsight, I’m probably lucky the way things worked out.

Bookmark and Share

Comments are closed.

Comments for this post are closed.

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

Anselm Berrigan
Abigail Deutsch
Tonya Foster
Melissa Friedling
John S. O'Connor
Barbara Jane Reyes
Amber Tamblyn
Edwin Torres

STAFF WRITERS

Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Henry Gould says: "Terreson, you misrepresent Christianity, & probably all those other religions too. You want ... MORE »
    Terreson | 11.21.09
  • Barbara Jane Reyes says: "And this brings me to my question: how do you write about ... MORE »
    Terreson | 11.20.09
  • I like the idea of immanent transcendence. Any approximation of ultimate truth would have to ... MORE »
    Wendy Babiak | 11.20.09
  • Terreson, you misrepresent Christianity, & probably all those other religions too. You want to ... MORE »
    Henry Gould | 11.20.09
  • What in sam hell is transcendent immanence? Any half-way tutored Jungian will tell you ... MORE »
    Terreson | 11.20.09

second sex takes second place? (31)
Señor Smith to you. (1)
Vladimir, Ron, and Gregori (4)
dubious poetry: the palin comparison (3)
To Vaya in the Viva of Time (2)

RECENT POSTS

MONTHLY ARCHIVE

CATEGORY ARCHIVE

PREVIOUS WRITERS

Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What is RSS?

Subscribe to Poetry
Poetry Learning Lab
Poetry Tool

OR SEARCH

CHICAGO EVENTS

Poetry Off the Shelf: Reginald Gibbons
Oidipous Tyrannos: Oedipus the King

Poetry Off the Shelf: Reginald Gibbons Oidipous Tyrannos: Oedipus the King Thu, December 3rd, 6:00 pm
National Hellenic Museum
801 West Adams Street, 4th Floor
Free admission

MORE EVENTS »

Subscribe to Poetry