Harriet

Jeffrey McDaniel

contests. contested. the pros and cons of testing.

It’s interesting to read the recent posts by Kwame and Kenny talking about first books and prizes (or the lack thereof). It makes me wonder what percentage of first books published each year are attached to contests. I’m glad that Kenny pointed out that a number of first books do get published each year outside the mainstream. (Is “mainpuddle” more appropriate?)


It’s undeniable that there has been a proliferation of first book contests over the past twenty years; in the late 80’s there were a handful and now there are dozens. The rash of contests is problematic for reasons beyond why an entity like Foetry was able to gain traction: (waiter, there’s a con in my test). It’s unhealthy when many poetry publishers won’t even read manuscripts without an entry fee. I can kind of understand the publishers’ defense: they’re understaffed, doing the best they can, first books are hard to sell, and the contest entry fees are a quick, reliable source of capital. But you hear stories, like Joshua Beckman entering fifty-two contests before Gerald Stern picked his manuscript, and it all starts to seem a little absurd.
Just for the record, I met my publisher at the National Poetry Slam in San Francisco in 1993. It was the second day of the event. I read a poem, Following Her To Sleep, that had been published in Ploughshares (and would later appear in Best American Poetry). (Strangely my poems that tended to do the best in slams were often also my poems that did the best on the page.) (By “did the best”, I mean getting published and anthologized.) Anyway, the publisher’s husband came up to me in an alleyway behind the venue where I was sharing a bottle of whisky with a poet from the other “team” (Asheville), a guy named Pat Storm—may he rest in peace—and the publisher’s husband casually mentioned that his wife (Jennifer Joseph at Manic D) would be interested in publishing my book.
At first, I declined. I wanted to win a contest, the Yale specifically. I wanted to be like James Tate. Luckily I moved away from that position and went with Manic D. Who knows how many contests I would have had to enter, (all those checks and clerical work), before something finally clicked. In hindsight, I’m probably lucky the way things worked out.

Bookmark and Share

Comments are closed.

Comments for this post are closed.

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

Thom Donovan
Bhanu Kapil
Fred Moten
Craig Santos Perez
Sina Queyras
Sotère Torregian

STAFF WRITERS

Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share

About Harriet

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Michael R. wrote: >If you’d been reading, you’d realize that the point of that passage is ... MORE »
    Kent Johnson | 03.21.10
  • Very cool. I had not heard of Piet Hein, and will look him up. A ... MORE »
    LH | 03.21.10
  • Definitely very cool, Craig. Very much liked kari edwards' book and will put this on ... MORE »
    Sina Queyras | 03.21.10
  • Yay, Janet! MORE »
    Mary Meriam | 03.20.10
  • @Sina: I have not heard of an opera singing poet, ... MORE »
    Colin Ward | 03.20.10

Beyond Careerism? (Redistributing Poetic... (31)
On the matter of career (40)
To Sonnet, to Son-net, Tuscon Net (55)
All sides now: a correspondence with Lisa... (4)
Women’s History Month: A Salute (3)

RECENT POSTS

MONTHLY ARCHIVE

CATEGORY ARCHIVE

PREVIOUS WRITERS

Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What is RSS?

IN THIS ISSUE: March 2010

Poetry Magazine

A selection of new work from Dorothea Grossman; new poems by Lavinia Greenlaw, David Yezzi, A.E. Stallings, Gerald Stern, and Dan Gerber; translations of Carlo Betocchi, and Mahmoud Darwish; an Editorial on Ruth Lilly; an exchange between Ilya Kaminsky and Adam Kirsch; an essay by Chen Li; and a review by Daisy Fried.

DC Poetry Tour

CHICAGO EVENTS

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker Fri, March 26th, 6:00 PM
Open Books
213 West Institute Place
Free admission

MORE EVENTS »