Everybody’s sayin’ it: “PhDs are the new MFAs.”
Say it ain’t so. I’m out of money.
Anybody out there got a PhD in creative writing? Why? Is it sexier? Do you get more dates? Does it make you smarter? Whaaat?
Comments for this post are closed.
Thom Donovan
Bhanu Kapil
Fred Moten
Craig Santos Perez
Sina Queyras
Sotère Torregian
Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share
Graphic Poetry Spotlight: Jai Arun Ravine’s... (3)
To Sonnet, to Son-net, Tuscon Net (54)
Beyond Careerism? (Redistributing Poetic... (30)
Women’s History Month: A Salute (3)
Teachability, Pedagogy, and Why You Can Easily... (5)
Copyright © 2010 Poetry Foundation Contact: mail@poetryfoundation.org Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
Poetryfoundation.org article RSS.
Magazine RSS.
Blog RSS.
Poem of the Day RSS.
Glossary Term of the Day RSS.
Morning Patricia,
Posted By: Mark Eleveld on June 20, 2007 at 7:14 amThere is a piece in Redux called ‘Candler’ by James Nave, I cheated a little and slipped it in the ‘Prose’ section, could easily be the start of a good, poetic, novel. He writes in line with Burke…add Carson McCullers, Kerouac of course, even Ian McEwan.
Report this comment
Don’t buy the hype.
Posted By: Jonathan on June 20, 2007 at 11:24 amReport this comment
I outright refuse to get a Ph.D. in creative writing. I’d rather go to get a doctorate in another discipline and just read a great deal without accruing more debt. I second an earlier comment with my own twist, Patricia–don’t drink the Kool-Aid.
Posted By: Tara Betts on June 22, 2007 at 5:18 pmReport this comment
A Ph.D. in creative writing? Negatory. A Ph.D. in English Lit, or Latino studies? Now that’s more my speed. I like having options. I don’t need to drop a dissertation on writing. People spew that literary caca in the pages of various highbrow literary journals without having to spend the extra money.
Posted By: Rich on June 23, 2007 at 4:13 pmReport this comment
Ph. Ds are so in vogue lately. They suggest a level of intellectual hierarchy that doesn’t apply in creative fields. In the arts, Ph.Ds are simply qualitatively different, not hierarchicaly superior. They are by their nature research and objectively oriented degrees. An MFA is a terminal degree because a practicing artist is a creatively engaged agent. (There’s no Ph.D. in Culinary Arts. Chefs COOK, they don’t TALK about cooking.) Ph. D in Creative Writing? It’s a degree in Modern Literature, fundamentally. If I’m an undergrad planning an academic career, maybe I’d skip the MFA and go for the the PhD to increase my awareness on both the consumer and creative end of literature. If you’ve already got an MFA, or better yet a book, it’s a redundant indulgence.
Posted By: C. S. Miranda on June 27, 2007 at 6:35 pmReport this comment