5 Comments for “School of Quietitude?”

1. (click to show comment)

   I recently identified myself as a School of Quietude poet in a poem I wrote and then placed online in my journal. I did so in part to alleviate the onus–call it a poetic coming out if you wish, and in part because for me it is at heart true, and partly in jest because I am so diverse.
   Brian Salchert

   

   Posted By: Brian Salchert on June 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm

2. (click to show comment)

   Uh, I don’t think blogging on Harriet could ever earn a DieKu poet the tag of SoQ, or any other poet for that matter.
   The problem with SoQ is shared by all categories, especially when they’re used to tag groups of human beings: they are shortcuts for our brains which are too primitive to perceive or process too many stimuli or differences at one time.
   In this month’s POETRY magazine, which Ron Silliman has tagged SoQ, Charles Bernstein, Ange Mlinko, and Frank Bidart appear. Does that mean they’re SoQ poets?
   What does SoQ mean anyway? Does anyone point to the original post on Silliman’s blog?

   

   Posted By: Emily Warn on June 18, 2007 at 4:31 pm

3. (click to show comment)

   Emily: there are roughly 1,700 mentions of “quietude” on Mr. Silliman’s blog but I think the first is mentioned here.
   It is likely that if you ask your questions in the comments section of a recent post of his blog you will get your answers there as well.
   Take care.

   

   Posted By: Jilly on June 21, 2007 at 1:26 am

4. (click to show comment)

   Hi Kenneth,
   I don’t think it’s possible for a writer to identify with the SoQ label unless it’s with irony (as with the commenter above), because it’s an essentially pejorative label, with only the most generalized characteristics. SoQ does not define a type of poetry, but says what a kind of poetry is NOT. SoQ for Silliman is anything that’s NOT his idea of the “avant-garde.”
   What I find most interesting to consider is the possibility that truly avant-garde work (which shatters some set of assumptions we don’t even know we hold) is just as, or even more, likely to emerge from outside some codified “school” (like Silliman’s)—i.e. from the vast, undefinable realm of Everything Else, which he calls the SoQ—as from within it.

   

   Posted By: Danielle Chapman on June 22, 2007 at 2:10 pm

5. (click to show comment)

   1700 mentions? Crikey!
   You’re right, though Jilly, if I have questions, I should go to the source.
   Thanks for your post and the links,
   Emily

   

   Posted By: emily warn on June 28, 2007 at 1:32 pm

Comments for this post are closed.