Harriet

Reginald Shepherd

My new New Year’s Resolutions

I have almost never made a new year’s resolution, but online events of the past month (I think we all know what I’m referring to) have prompted me, belatedly, to make some for this year, plus a couple more just for good measure. Instead of nine muses, I have nine resolutions. This post is partly humorous, but fundamentally, I’m quite serious.


1) I will not participate in arguments or discussions that confuse and conflate poetry and politics. (This will be a tough one to stick to, especially since it covers much of the ground of several other resolutions.)
2) I will not argue with several specific persons with whom I have publicly argued in the past. There is simply no point in expending the time and energy. As a starting point, I will not mention their names here.
3) I will not respond to attacks on my person or my character. (Another one that will be hard to stick to.)
4) I will not read comments after ten PM. It interferes with my already fitful sleep.
5) I will remember that when people talk trash to or about me online, they are responding to a mental effigy that has nothing whatsoever to do with me or what I have actually written. (The evidence for this is overwhelming.)
6) I will remember that I was never one of the cool kids, that I never liked the cool kids, and that I shouldn’t ever try to be one of the cool kids.
7) I will not stoop, not even to conquer. (Another toughie, but I will try my best.) 8) I will always put my new and overpriced glasses in the same place when I take them off, so I won’t ever again have to spend half a day looking for them.
9) I will again take off the fifteen pounds I lost while in the hospital last year (where I was able to eat nothing for a week) and during the period in which I had short gut syndrome following the removal of my tumor and a portion of my colon. The cancer diet needs to be good for something, after all.

Bookmark and Share

2 Comments for “My new New Year’s Resolutions”

  1. A wise list, Reginald! Number 5 in particular. (I love the “mental effigy” concept.) Like movie actors with whom people fall in love or in hate, writers—especially in their online incarnations (incybernations?)—are at the mercy of the frustrated, the angry, the small-minded, and the frankly insane.
    Did you see Bill Moyers’ Journal Friday night? He interviewed Susan Jacoby regarding her new book, The Age of American Unreason, and during the conversation she mentioned a 2006 National Geographic poll of 18- to 24-year-olds which found that only 23 percent of those with some college could locate Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Israel on a map. Not a blank map, mind you, but a map with the names of the countries shown! In other words, these beneficiaries of our educational system couldn’t identify the Middle East—otherwise, they would have discovered all four countries there.
    My point is this: When respondents to your posts flaunt their ignorance, remember that they are members of that benighted 23 percent—and therefore their opinions are utterly irrelevant.
    Keep up the good work!

    Posted By: Joseph Hutchison on February 17, 2008 at 1:48 pm
    Report this comment
  2. The hardest one of these might be number 6: it is SO hard to remember that one did not even ever really WANT to be one of the cool kids! Because, after all, they were supposed to be cool, and everyone wants to be cool, right?

    Posted By: Andrew Shields on February 17, 2008 at 3:35 pm
    Report this comment

Comments for this post are closed.

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

Thom Donovan
Bhanu Kapil
Fred Moten
Craig Santos Perez
Sina Queyras
Sotère Torregian

STAFF WRITERS

Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share

About Harriet

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Glad to be of help with your career - MORE »
    Henry Gould | 03.19.10
  • Nikki, What you're describing resonates with me. I wrote for many years before I took ... MORE »
    Sina Queyras | 03.19.10
  • Sina - If you want a copy of The Reality Street Book of Sonnets you ... MORE »
    Jeff Hilson | 03.19.10
  • "Poets don’t have careers. That’s what everybody else has. Poets are the only ones without ... MORE »
    SherylLuna@gmail.com | 03.18.10
  • Gary Geddes has offered us some amazing anthologies, among other things. Thanks for the reminder. MORE »
    Sina Queyras | 03.18.10

Who or what is a poet critic and why is the... (27)
Graphic Poetry Spotlight: Jai Arun Ravine’s... (3)
Beyond Careerism? (Redistributing Poetic... (30)
Women’s History Month: A Salute (3)
Teachability, Pedagogy, and Why You Can Easily... (5)

RECENT POSTS

MONTHLY ARCHIVE

CATEGORY ARCHIVE

PREVIOUS WRITERS

Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What is RSS?

IN THIS ISSUE: March 2010

Poetry Magazine

A selection of new work from Dorothea Grossman; new poems by Lavinia Greenlaw, David Yezzi, A.E. Stallings, Gerald Stern, and Dan Gerber; translations of Carlo Betocchi, and Mahmoud Darwish; an Editorial on Ruth Lilly; an exchange between Ilya Kaminsky and Adam Kirsch; an essay by Chen Li; and a review by Daisy Fried.

Chicago Poetry Tour

CHICAGO EVENTS

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker Fri, March 26th, 6:00 PM
Open Books
213 West Institute Place
Free admission

MORE EVENTS »