Harriet

Categories

Harriet
Contributors

Archive

Blogroll

Criticism

This Is Just to Say

By Reginald Shepherd

I have posted a revised and much longer version of my Harriet post on “post-avant-garde” poetry, now titled “Defining Post-Avant-Garde Poetry,” on my own blog, to be found here.
In this extended version of the piece I discuss various writers’ conceptions of the phenomenon I address, including Paul Hoover’s new modernism, Stephen Burt’s ellipticism, and Ron Silliman’s third way. I also further expand on the idea that the mainstream/avant-garde dichotomy is outmoded. I hope that all who are interested in this topic will take a look.

2008-03-01

Comments (4)

  • On March 1, 2008 at 9:16 pm Troy Camplin, Ph.D. wrote:

    There was already a post-avant garde movement, known as the derriere garde.
    Report this comment

  • On March 1, 2008 at 9:47 pm Brian Salchert wrote:

    This night I read the post on your blog; and then–after doing an
    “elliptical poetry” search–read a related essay:
    Tony Hoagland’s
    “Fear of Narrative and the Skittery Poem of Our Moment”;
    and now I am going to find and read
    Kenneth Golsmith’s related essay.
    Some days ago I read Joshua Corey’s essay
    and Robert Archambeau’s essay.
    This chase I’m into is starting to get like a seminar in reverse.
    Had already read most of Paul Hoover’s related Norton anthology.
    Report this comment

  • On March 4, 2008 at 11:23 am Jonathan David Jackson wrote:

    Dear world:

    • Narrow sight means narrow vision.
    • The more I think about whether my art is experimental or traditional the less I get done.
    • Traditional and experimental: these are as constitutive, shifting, and perceptual as the other great descriptive fictions of our age: race, gender, sexuality and beyond.
    • Where is your generosity as a reader, as a writer?
    • Don’t swallow stones just because they glitter; don’t eat spoiled meat even if it smells sweet.
    • Anything can be turned: the subversive becomes fashionable; the commonplace, cutting-edge.
    • What is the structural principle within the work?
    • How does (or does not) the work’s structural principle animate substance over surface effect?
    • How does—-how will-—the work endure?
    • Good work is its own recognition so why worry about who gets awards?
    • Complaints, controversies, and concepts are curious: they purport to bring us closer to the work through heightened discussion while simultaneously distancing us from the particularities of the art itself
    • If you become enraged or aggrieved when you read a work that does not conform to your ideals to the point where you label, rant, rail, and condemn, then you need to make a trip to Darfur in Sudan or to any number of inner city environments or even to a foreclosed house in the suburbs so you may rediscover your generosity and relocate what is dire in our age.
    • If a mosquito could pull a plow then I would surely hook her up.
    • I’d rather be an artisan like an unsightly plumber, pants-ill-fitted, kneeling before open pipes, then an artist who is overly concerned with the lie of greatness and the devilry of my work’s reception.
    • Favor really is deceit.
    • As soon as you feel you are entitled to something as an artist you have already missed the generous point of your practice.
    • Your work is no more important anyone else’s.
    • Greatness is the worse kind of advertising: good work demands more than a slogan, more than platitudes, more than superlatives, more than favor, more, more, more—it keeps demanding and questioning–refusing hagiography, refusing memorials, refusing labels, refusing in-groups and out-groups, refusing to be done.

    Sincerely yours,
    Jonathan David Jackson
    Report this comment

  • On March 6, 2008 at 12:24 am Mary Meriam wrote:

    Greatness is the worse kind of advertising: good work demands more than a slogan, more than platitudes, more than superlatives, more than favor, more, more, more—it keeps demanding and questioning–refusing hagiography, refusing memorials, refusing labels, refusing in-groups and out-groups, refusing to be done.
    I kind of like this one, Jonathan David Jackson. More, more, more, how do you like it, how do you like it – (remember that song, Reginald?) [Good work] keeps demanding and questioning – yes, it does.
    Report this comment


Posted in Criticism, Group Blog on Saturday, March 1st, 2008 by Reginald Shepherd.