I have posted a revised and much longer version of my Harriet post on “post-avant-garde” poetry, now titled “Defining Post-Avant-Garde Poetry,” on my own blog, to be found here.
In this extended version of the piece I discuss various writers’ conceptions of the phenomenon I address, including Paul Hoover’s new modernism, Stephen Burt’s ellipticism, and Ron Silliman’s third way. I also further expand on the idea that the mainstream/avant-garde dichotomy is outmoded. I hope that all who are interested in this topic will take a look.






There was already a post-avant garde movement, known as the derriere garde.
This night I read the post on your blog; and then–after doing an
“elliptical poetry” search–read a related essay:
Tony Hoagland’s
“Fear of Narrative and the Skittery Poem of Our Moment”;
and now I am going to find and read
Kenneth Golsmith’s related essay.
Some days ago I read Joshua Corey’s essay
and Robert Archambeau’s essay.
This chase I’m into is starting to get like a seminar in reverse.
Had already read most of Paul Hoover’s related Norton anthology.
Dear world:
Sincerely yours,
Jonathan David Jackson
Greatness is the worse kind of advertising: good work demands more than a slogan, more than platitudes, more than superlatives, more than favor, more, more, more—it keeps demanding and questioning–refusing hagiography, refusing memorials, refusing labels, refusing in-groups and out-groups, refusing to be done.
I kind of like this one, Jonathan David Jackson. More, more, more, how do you like it, how do you like it – (remember that song, Reginald?) [Good work] keeps demanding and questioning – yes, it does.