Harriet

Reginald Shepherd

This Is Just to Say

I have posted a revised and much longer version of my Harriet post on “post-avant-garde” poetry, now titled “Defining Post-Avant-Garde Poetry,” on my own blog, to be found here.
In this extended version of the piece I discuss various writers’ conceptions of the phenomenon I address, including Paul Hoover’s new modernism, Stephen Burt’s ellipticism, and Ron Silliman’s third way. I also further expand on the idea that the mainstream/avant-garde dichotomy is outmoded. I hope that all who are interested in this topic will take a look.

Bookmark and Share

4 Comments for “This Is Just to Say”

  1. There was already a post-avant garde movement, known as the derriere garde.

    Posted By: Troy Camplin, Ph.D. on March 1, 2008 at 9:16 pm
    Report this comment
  2. This night I read the post on your blog; and then–after doing an
    “elliptical poetry” search–read a related essay:
    Tony Hoagland’s
    “Fear of Narrative and the Skittery Poem of Our Moment”;
    and now I am going to find and read
    Kenneth Golsmith’s related essay.
    Some days ago I read Joshua Corey’s essay
    and Robert Archambeau’s essay.
    This chase I’m into is starting to get like a seminar in reverse.
    Had already read most of Paul Hoover’s related Norton anthology.

    Posted By: Brian Salchert on March 1, 2008 at 9:47 pm
    Report this comment
  3. Dear world:

    • Narrow sight means narrow vision.
    • The more I think about whether my art is experimental or traditional the less I get done.
    • Traditional and experimental: these are as constitutive, shifting, and perceptual as the other great descriptive fictions of our age: race, gender, sexuality and beyond.
    • Where is your generosity as a reader, as a writer?
    • Don’t swallow stones just because they glitter; don’t eat spoiled meat even if it smells sweet.
    • Anything can be turned: the subversive becomes fashionable; the commonplace, cutting-edge.
    • What is the structural principle within the work?
    • How does (or does not) the work’s structural principle animate substance over surface effect?
    • How does—-how will-—the work endure?
    • Good work is its own recognition so why worry about who gets awards?
    • Complaints, controversies, and concepts are curious: they purport to bring us closer to the work through heightened discussion while simultaneously distancing us from the particularities of the art itself
    • If you become enraged or aggrieved when you read a work that does not conform to your ideals to the point where you label, rant, rail, and condemn, then you need to make a trip to Darfur in Sudan or to any number of inner city environments or even to a foreclosed house in the suburbs so you may rediscover your generosity and relocate what is dire in our age.
    • If a mosquito could pull a plow then I would surely hook her up.
    • I’d rather be an artisan like an unsightly plumber, pants-ill-fitted, kneeling before open pipes, then an artist who is overly concerned with the lie of greatness and the devilry of my work’s reception.
    • Favor really is deceit.
    • As soon as you feel you are entitled to something as an artist you have already missed the generous point of your practice.
    • Your work is no more important anyone else’s.
    • Greatness is the worse kind of advertising: good work demands more than a slogan, more than platitudes, more than superlatives, more than favor, more, more, more—it keeps demanding and questioning–refusing hagiography, refusing memorials, refusing labels, refusing in-groups and out-groups, refusing to be done.

    Sincerely yours,
    Jonathan David Jackson

    Posted By: Jonathan David Jackson on March 4, 2008 at 11:23 am
    Report this comment
  4. Greatness is the worse kind of advertising: good work demands more than a slogan, more than platitudes, more than superlatives, more than favor, more, more, more—it keeps demanding and questioning–refusing hagiography, refusing memorials, refusing labels, refusing in-groups and out-groups, refusing to be done.
    I kind of like this one, Jonathan David Jackson. More, more, more, how do you like it, how do you like it – (remember that song, Reginald?) [Good work] keeps demanding and questioning – yes, it does.

    Posted By: Mary Meriam on March 6, 2008 at 12:24 am
    Report this comment

Comments for this post are closed.

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

Thom Donovan
Bhanu Kapil
Fred Moten
Craig Santos Perez
Sina Queyras
Sotère Torregian

STAFF WRITERS

Cathy Halley
Michael Marcinkowski
Travis Nichols
Fred Sasaki
Don Share

About Harriet

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Michael R. wrote: >If you’d been reading, you’d realize that the point of that passage is ... MORE »
    Kent Johnson | 03.21.10
  • Very cool. I had not heard of Piet Hein, and will look him up. A ... MORE »
    LH | 03.21.10
  • Definitely very cool, Craig. Very much liked kari edwards' book and will put this on ... MORE »
    Sina Queyras | 03.21.10
  • Yay, Janet! MORE »
    Mary Meriam | 03.20.10
  • @Sina: I have not heard of an opera singing poet, ... MORE »
    Colin Ward | 03.20.10

Beyond Careerism? (Redistributing Poetic... (31)
On the matter of career (40)
To Sonnet, to Son-net, Tuscon Net (55)
All sides now: a correspondence with Lisa... (4)
Women’s History Month: A Salute (3)

RECENT POSTS

MONTHLY ARCHIVE

CATEGORY ARCHIVE

PREVIOUS WRITERS

Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What is RSS?

IN THIS ISSUE: March 2010

Poetry Magazine

A selection of new work from Dorothea Grossman; new poems by Lavinia Greenlaw, David Yezzi, A.E. Stallings, Gerald Stern, and Dan Gerber; translations of Carlo Betocchi, and Mahmoud Darwish; an Editorial on Ruth Lilly; an exchange between Ilya Kaminsky and Adam Kirsch; an essay by Chen Li; and a review by Daisy Fried.

DC Poetry Tour

CHICAGO EVENTS

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker

Poetry Off the Shelf: David Baker Fri, March 26th, 6:00 PM
Open Books
213 West Institute Place
Free admission

MORE EVENTS »