Conceptual Poetry Conference: Audio and Video

Comments (3)

• On June 11, 2008 at 10:16 pm Brian Salchert wrote:

  Was going to begin this in a wise-ass manner, but. . . .
  -
  Mr. Goldsmith,
  Your appropriative, uncreative, et cetera approach requires
  a level of patience and stamina and whetever else
  I do not possess although there have been periods in my life
  when I have managed myself and time in similar ways.
  -
  On appropriation: If you know–unless there really is
  another Brian Salchert, would you be willing to send
  me an email regarding who appropriated my name
  in the comments beneath your 11-14-2007 Play List
  in Paper Cuts? I don’t intend to do anything about
  it, but I would like to know.
  Thank you,
  Brian A. J. Salchert
  Report this comment

• On June 13, 2008 at 7:42 am Vivek Narayanan wrote:

  Ah great, thanks. As for “conceptual poetry”, it seems to me all poetry is and ought to be conceptual, but this is the thing I really love and appreciate about it– its willingness to give itself away on the internet, making it accessible to all across borders.
  Report this comment

• On June 18, 2008 at 8:34 am Doodle wrote:

  Since the focus on technique and genre these talks demonsrate inexorably leads to the reverence for names, it’s obvious that what this all boils down to is: professional maneuvers of, by, and for the professional cognoscenti.
  Report this comment