Harriet

Categories

Follow Harriet on Twitter

About Harriet

Blogroll

Adam Pendleton at SEGUE series

By Thom Donovan

artwork_images_161_518676_adam-pendleton

For the past two winters I have had the privilege of curating the SEGUE reading series, last winter with Evelyn Reilly, this winter with Sara Wintz. SEGUE has featured innovative writing since the 70s when the series was held at the Ear Inn bar in TriBeCa. Originally identified with Language Writing, SEGUE features a diverse range of socially and politically committed writing and performance practices. It is currently housed at the Bowery Poetry Club in Manhattan.

The following is an introduction I read for the visual artist Adam Pendleton this evening at SEGUE. For me, introductions are a way to focus an audience’s attention before they hear a reading, warming them up for what they are about to hear. In my introductions I tend to provide contextualizing information about the person I am introducing, but also try to ‘say’ something about their work. Which is to say, attempt to access some kernel about the writer’s work/project/person.

Next week’s SEGUE reading will feature current Harriet blogger Fred Moten, and poet/translator/editor Mónica de la Torre. For those who will be in town next Saturday please join us!

My first encounter with Adam Pendleton’s work was in the fall of 2007 during the Performa live arts biennial. Pendleton, among a handful of other artists including Yvonne Rainer and Isaac Julian, had been commissioned to create a performance-based work. What he produced—entitled The Revival—was extravagant to say the least: a full on gospel choir with four-piece band and Pendleton playing preacher, parrying with the best of them. What was unique to me about Pendleton’s revival was foremost its negotiation of sincere modes of address with ironic ones, and of avant poetries (John Ashbery, Leslie Scalapino, Paolo Javier) with autobiographical writings by Gay health activists. As Pendleton explains in an interview with Jess Wilcox, The Revival presented a means of addressing appropriation strategies in art via non-mastery, a function of appropriation that would not only recognize what one already knows—the trap of anagnorisis—but also make available new pathways for inquiry and experience. As Pendleton states in the 2009 interview with Wilcox in Art in America:

 In no way am I a master of the revivalist form and have no desire to be. I question the power and energy of speech – perhaps ironically so. I understand the particular cultural potential of specific forms and appropriate them — but more importantly, I bring them into an experimental space. In many ways, appropriation is nothing more than offering back what we know. I don’t dramatize this process. Yet, it is clearly a kind of possession-possession. Mastery and things like the energy and power of speech are just a way of articulating the recognition of an element of something we are culturally familiar with, or aware of. That’s why experimental spaces are so important. At their best, they move beyond these known quantities.

Given the many ambivalences of The Revival, Pendleton’s practice makes me wonder about the stakes of art post identity politics and, furthermore, post identity. It also presents a radical case for why experimentation in the arts, and I would argue within a culture at large, is a kind of good unto itself inasmuch as it overturns the categorical logics which we are prone to impose on the world and the world on us. Through experimentation, Pendleton embraces an avant garde tradition without guarantee; which is to say, he embraces such a tradition on his own terms, renewing what it means to be committed to experimental and/or avant garde identified cultural practices.

That Pendleton’s recent solo-exhibition “EL T D    K” pays tribute to Amiri Baraka’s 1964 poem “Black Dada Nihilismus” seems a perfectly logical step in Pendleton’s practice. Listening to Baraka read his poem tonight repeatedly at PennSound, from a 1964 reading at the Asilomar Negro Writers Conference in Pacific Grove, California, I could hear in Baraka’s reading echoes of the ambivalence that Pendleton himself brings to the performance of his work—an ever-shifting blend of irony and sincerity, affirmation and negation, caveat and invitation. Through his identification with a white, European avant garde movement—Dada—Baraka gives voice to a genealogy of violent struggle against a society of white masters. Given the content of Pendleton’s exhibition—a set of paintings with only phonemes painted on them, a long row of boxy lithographs reproducing widely known photo-documents from canonical 60s and 70s art performances, and a Sol LeWitt-like installation of black cubes entitled “Black Dada”—like Baraka before him Pendleton would seem to recover a white-identified art tradition for Black and Gay liberation struggles while calling into question the perceived reduction such reappropriative gestures can perform.

If Pendleton’s photographic reproductions impose representational history upon its viewer—the representational history of a canonized avant garde—the words and proto-words that Pendleton paints upon the photographic images efface the representational content of such an archive while simultaneously preserving it (a kind of duck rabbit of non-representational ‘word’ and representational ‘image’). In the same interview Pendleton writes: “I am working to establish a system of display, of organization. I want to create a situation where we’re inclined to rethink notions of the past and the future, as well as our ability to understand them enough to make reductive statements.” I like that in Pendleton’s work the future and the past are up for grabs, and the predominant site of their contested meaning remains “language”—the language of images and words which, as Pendleton reminds us, “can also determine thought.”

Comments (7)

  • On January 10, 2010 at 2:49 pm David Buuck wrote:

    I’d also point twds Pendleton’s wonderful experiments with the magazine in his Lab project as another site of exploration as to what the artist/editor/producer can ‘make mean’ “without guarantee”—

    http://www.e-flux.com/shows/view/3788
    http://welcometolab.org/think.html?id=25

    DBuuck

  • On January 10, 2010 at 4:18 pm Patrick Durgin wrote:

    Adam previously developed the “black dada” concept in a work involving, if not revolving around, that of Hannah Weiner. Here is a link to the performance at the ICA, London: http://www.ica.org.uk/Adam%20Pendleton+20072.twl

  • On January 10, 2010 at 5:35 pm Thom Donovan wrote:

    thanks for this link Patrick. Adam and I had a chance to chat extensively before and after the event and he mentioned the influence of Weiner. I don’t see the connection yet btwn Black Dada and HW but hope to as Adam’s work becomes more legible to me… hope you and Andrea are well in Chi-town… –Thom

  • On January 10, 2010 at 5:42 pm Thom Donovan wrote:

    Buuck: how goes poet’s theater “instructions” fest? I wld like to “cover” that at Harriet in case there is any documentation you’d like to provide me with. I take it the Glenn Beck performance is a bust???…

    LAB’s great–yes! thanks for more links…

    Nada Gordon has a write up of the SEGUE event here: http://ululate.blogspot.com/
    which of course also featured Judith Goldman, one of my very favorite contemporary poets.

    Judith’s homophonic versions of Public Enemy’s “Louder Than a Bomb” and Run DMC’s “Walk This Way” were pretty amazing, but her reading of *The Dispossessions* took the cake–SO brutal.

    both Adam’s reading and Judith’s shld be up soon at PennSound with other SEGUE recordings from the current season

    • On January 10, 2010 at 6:11 pm Bhanu Kapil wrote:

      That was wierd. I just invoked David Buuck in my first ever blogpost and the second I clicked it, Thom, I saw the word Buuck in the comment update stream and…well, it’s confusing. Magical.

  • On January 10, 2010 at 6:06 pm Sina Queyras wrote:

    Thom, I don’t know much about Judith Goldman. Will we have a post?

  • On January 10, 2010 at 6:29 pm Thom Donovan wrote:

    Harriet has made us telepathic Bhanu. what shape am I thinking of? triangle? squiggly lines? circle?

    I hadn’t planned on posting about Judith at Harriet Sina, tho wld like to. here is something I wrote about The Dispossessions elsewhere:

    http://whof.blogspot.com/2009/11/dispossessions-via-negativa.html

    oh yeah, Michael Cross has a great piece about her and Jen Scappettone’s work in the new ON (currently at the printers!). definitely worth checking out!

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized on Saturday, January 9th, 2010 by Thom Donovan.