Harriet

Categories

Follow Harriet on Twitter

About Harriet

Blogroll

The Man Booker Prize for Uncreative Writing

By Kenneth Goldsmith

Poet and professor Craig Dworkin has done some research into the Man Booker prize and, as it turns out, it’s the world’s most lucrative prize for uncreative writing. Speaking in the Big Ideas lecture series the Whitechapel Gallery during the London Art Book Fair last fall, Dworkin gave example synopses from the 2011 Man Booker Prize shortlist:

  • The story of one man coming to terms with the mutable past.
  • His journey – if he survives it – will push faith, love and friendship to their utmost limits.
  • A novel about the things you tell yourself in order to be able to continue to live the life you find yourself in, and what happens when those stories no longer work.
  • The horror of betrayal, the burden of loyalty and the possibility that, if you don’t tell your story, someone else might tell it for you.

Dworkin’s analysis continues:

The hundred-thousandth coming of age novel, developing psychological portraits of characters amidst difficult romantic relationships and family tensions, is somehow still within the bounds of the properly ‘creative’; yet the first or second work to use previously written source texts, even in some novel way, are still felt to be troublingly improper.

And moreover, we don’t think of the Booker Prize Finalists as unoriginal, or uncreative, or plagiarized, despite the fact that they have close precedents and that we can imagine confusing them with another work.  Take ‘a story of innocence and experience, hope and harsh reality’: a quick Google search (conducted last fall prior to the announcement of the winner) reveals that these are the exact words used to describe Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Young Goodman Brown; Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird; William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet; Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club; James Joyce’s ‘Araby’ (and that’s just the first page of results).

Nor do we think of these works as unoriginal, or uncreative, or plagiarized, despite the fact that just from the one paragraph synopses on the Man Booker website we learn that 4 of the 6 shortlisted novels advertise themselves as featuring immigrants negotiating the difficulties of a strange land; 5 of the 6 hinge on the dramatic turn of a murder; 4 of the 6 reveal secrets from the past that come unexpectedly to light (half of them through the surprise arrival of a letter); 4 of the 6 reveal the unreliability of narration; and so on — all of which is starting to sound a lot like a Charles Dickens novel.

But they’re all, no doubt, very original works.

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized on Monday, April 16th, 2012 by Kenneth Goldsmith.