Uncategorized

Match Point

Originally Published: September 14, 2008

dfw-tennis.jpg
David Foster Wallace by Nick Maniatis
Fiction doesn’t come up much here on Harriet, but I’m guessing most Harriet readers look at it now and then. That’s a bad segue to the sad news that David Foster Wallace killed himself on Friday. His wife discovered his hanged body. Ugh. Wallace didn’t write poems, as far as I know, but he wrote some great essays on tennis, the film industry, and cruise ships, and also wrote a pretty amazing novel about pot and tennis. I've been playing tennis off an on since I was seven, sometimes in the same club circuit Wallace played in, and have yet to read anyone write on the game play of elite players—in any sport—with anywhere near the intensity, abandon, and precision he did (you should read his essay in the New York Times magazine on Roger Federer)[1]. Plus, Infinite Jest pissed people off, and was beautifully written. How many writers can say they did one of those things with their work, let alone both? RIP, DFW.
[1] You may read the piece here. Bear in mind that after the piece was published, Federer went on a cold streak, for him, before participating in what some[2] have called the greatest tennis match ever played, and then, just last week, he won the U.S. Open, handily, with a display of baseline and net work that Wallace thinks about in his article in a way that, reading the piece post-U.S. Open, opens Federer's game up in ways I hadn't thought possible (hyperbole noted by the author).
[2] John McEnroe goes on at length about Federer and the match in question here. I wish Wallace had the chance to sit down with Johnny Mac, thus bringing the best tennis writer together with the the most articulate tennis player of his generation, and probably ever.

Poet and filmmaker Nick Twemlow is a senior editor of the Iowa Review and co-editor of Canarium Books...

Read Full Biography